Imagine a world where AI assistants handle your shopping effortlessly, picking out the perfect deals and placing orders on your behalf—but what if the giant retailer behind it all decides to shut that down? That's the battle unfolding between Amazon and Perplexity, setting the stage for a showdown over who controls the future of smart shopping.
Dive into this story with me, and you'll see how innovation in artificial intelligence is clashing with corporate control. For beginners just getting into the world of AI, let's clarify: Agentic AI refers to smart systems that can act autonomously on your behalf, like a digital helper that not only suggests products but actually completes the purchase process. It's a step up from basic chatbots, giving users more independence in their online interactions. And this is the part most people miss—how such tech could revolutionize everyday tasks, but only if companies like Amazon allow it.
The conflict kicked off when AI startup Perplexity, known for its innovative tools, published a blog post on Tuesday, November 4, 2025, detailing what they called an 'aggressive legal threat' from Amazon. The e-commerce behemoth reportedly demanded that Perplexity block users of its Comet browser—a sleek AI-powered search tool—from deploying their virtual assistants to shop directly on Amazon's platform. Perplexity isn't backing down; in their post, they vowed to stand firm and advocate for users' rights to leverage agentic AI to manage their digital experiences fully.
'Amazon seems to have forgotten its roots,' Perplexity remarked in the post. 'Customers adore the platform for its wide selection of quality items at affordable prices with speedy delivery. Agentic shopping builds on this legacy, fulfilling a growing demand that people are already voicing. At Perplexity, we're committed to providing that option.'
But here's where it gets controversial: Amazon fired back with a statement on their website, arguing that it's only reasonable for third-party apps facilitating purchases on other companies' sites to honor those businesses' choices about participation. They explained that this approach maintains a smooth user experience and mirrors how other industries operate, such as food delivery apps coordinating with restaurants or online travel agencies booking flights with airlines. Amazon emphasized that agentic third-party tools like Perplexity's Comet carry similar responsibilities, and they've repeatedly asked Perplexity to exclude Amazon from the Comet interface, citing how it leads to a poorer shopping experience and diminished customer support.
To give you a bit more context, think of it like this: If a ride-sharing app started directing drivers to take detours without the riders' consent, it could disrupt the whole system. Amazon is essentially saying that without their buy-in, these AI agents create friction, much like uninvited guests at a party who mess up the vibe.
This isn't the first time Amazon has taken steps to protect its turf. Back in July 2025, reports revealed that the company tweaked its website's code to block AI shopping tools from competitors, including those from tech giants like Google, and others from firms such as Perplexity, Anthropic, and OpenAI. It was a proactive move to safeguard the platform's integrity.
Fast-forward to September 2025, and PYMNTS highlighted how the growth of agentic AI is pushing businesses to weigh its immense economic opportunities against potential downsides, like security risks or disrupted ecosystems. For instance, while agentic AI could streamline supply chains or personalize customer service, it might also open doors to misuse, such as automated bots overwhelming systems or even facilitating fraudulent activities if not properly monitored.
So, where do you stand on this? Is Amazon justified in defending its platform to ensure top-notch service, or is Perplexity right that open innovation should win out, empowering users to dictate how they shop? Could this be a classic case of a dominant player stifling competition, or perhaps a necessary safeguard against chaotic AI deployments? Share your thoughts in the comments—do you agree with Perplexity's bold stance, or do you side with Amazon's caution? And what if this sets a precedent for how AI integrates into other aspects of our lives, like banking or healthcare? Let's discuss!
For more insights into the evolving world of AI, why not subscribe to PYMNTS' daily AI Newsletter? It's a great way to stay updated on these developments without missing a beat.
